Filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Connection ErrorHow many of the applications you use on a daily basis are web-based as opposed to locally installed native applications? For me, the answer is way more than I ever would have expected.

Had you asked me this question a few years ago, I would have vehemently denied that the future of development is on the web. As much as I could see and comprehend the value of a ubiquitously available web-based application, there’s just no way to approach the level of power and integration (not to mention the ability to be always-available) that is possible with well conceived and developed desktop software.

Of course, back then I didn’t envision that web applications could become as useful as Google Calendar or Remember the Milk. I also didn’t envision that light - yet still useful - versions of these apps would be available from my mobile phone almost wherever I was.

In fact, and much to my surprise, this day most of my personal data this day is tied up in on the internet services: Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Docs, Backpack, Remember the Milk, Facebook, Newsgator, and Evernote to name just a few.

Most of these are probably pretty familiar names, but one is a newcomer in the web space: Evernote. Still in beta, the new version of Evernote contains a full-featured web version, but synchronizes seamlessly with desktop software on either Windows or Mac platforms. And it’s a breath of fresh air.


Continue reading Should software be native or web-based?

Permalink

You might also be interested in these

Leave a Reply

Close
E-mail It